Welcome to Christian States of America dot net

About Us

We are fighting a WAR against the Godless

America was founded as a Christian nation-an experiment of whether free men could govern themselves, without kings or masters. We are a special people, from all over, who are self-sufficient, self-reliant rugged, God-fearing  individuals, who assimilate into ONE people and speak the same language- English- and  who earn their own keep, and only accept help for as long as they need it. We love our families, and will fight to protect them, from our government, or any person or group who seeks to subvert or  destroy the Noble American Experiment that so many died to construct. Strangers came here for the chance to make their own way, and to prosper and become Americans. They did not come here for any freebies or benefits, or to keep their own flags,  nationalities, and languages.  

If you are against the American Experiment, then you must get out. Head first or feet first.

You cannot make a deal with Communists, Democrats,  muslums, or RINOs. They have no intention of keeping their word.

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” – Patrick Henry – 1775

Trump shows Nasty Pelosi that he has what she hasn't got...


Trump denies Pelosi military aircraft for 'public relations' trip

[Alright, this has has got be the most epic slap down I have ever heard of, no other “politician” would attempt this. I wonder how much money he just saved the taxpayer? Nan’s gonna be SO pissed.]

CNN- Pelosi had been scheduled to leave within the hour that Trump's letter was made public, making for the awkward site [sic] of a large blue Air Force bus idling outside the Capitol as the implications of the President's missive came into focus.

The administration "worked with the Air Force and (the Defense Department) and basically took away the rights to the plane from the speaker," one White House official said.

The White House released Trump's letter to Pelosi a day after she suggested the President postpone his planned State of the Union address, scheduled for later this month, until the government shutdown is resolved.
"Due to the Shutdown, I am sorry to inform you that your trip to Brussels, Egypt, and Afghanistan has been postponed," Trump wrote Pelosi on Thursday. "We will reschedule this seven-day excursion when the Shutdown is over."
Later, Pelosi's spokesman said the stop in Brussels was mainly to allow the pilot to rest and that Egypt was not on her itinerary.
Even though Afghanistan -- an active US combat zone -- was one of the countries on her planned itinerary, Trump suggested she fly commercial.
"Obviously, if you would like to make your journey by flying commercial, that would certainly be your prerogative," Trump wrote.
The President has the authority to direct the Defense Department to not use military assets to support a congressional delegation to military theaters. That includes air transport and additional security procedures.
White House officials, including acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, began discussing canceling Pelosi's trip early Thursday morning, according to two people with knowledge of how the day unfolded. Aides felt caught off guard when Pelosi publicly released her letter calling on Trump to postpone his State of the Union address, or deliver it in writing, and felt canceling the military air travel would be an ideal response.
Trump's penned retort amounted to his first public response to Pelosi's Wednesday letter, in which she suggested "we work together to determine another suitable date after the government has re-opened" for the State of the Union address.

The White House released Trump's letter to Pelosi a day after she suggested the President postpone his planned State of the Union address, scheduled for later this month, until the government shutdown is resolved.
"Due to the Shutdown, I am sorry to inform you that your trip to Brussels, Egypt, and Afghanistan has been postponed," Trump wrote Pelosi on Thursday. "We will reschedule this seven-day excursion when the Shutdown is over."
Later, Pelosi's spokesman said the stop in Brussels was mainly to allow the pilot to rest and that Egypt was not on her itinerary.
Even though Afghanistan -- an active US combat zone -- was one of the countries on her planned itinerary, Trump suggested she fly commercial.
"Obviously, if you would like to make your journey by flying commercial, that would certainly be your prerogative," Trump wrote.
The President has the authority to direct the Defense Department to not use military assets to support a congressional delegation to military theaters. That includes air transport and additional security procedures.
White House officials, including acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, began discussing canceling Pelosi's trip early Thursday morning, according to two people with knowledge of how the day unfolded. Aides felt caught off guard when Pelosi publicly released her letter calling on Trump to postpone his State of the Union address, or deliver it in writing, and felt canceling the military air travel would be an ideal response.
Trump's penned retort amounted to his first public response to Pelosi's Wednesday letter, in which she suggested "we work together to determine another suitable date after the government has re-opened" for the State of the Union address.*



“I would like to add that these congressional trips (codels – meaning congressional delegations) are just boondoggles. I worked at two American embassies overseas and these delegations are just excuses to go on holiday, go sightseeing, enjoy good restaurants and hotels and then participate in a 15 minute meeting to justify the whole thing.

One of the embassies I worked in was in Brussels – home of some of the best restaurants and makers of the best beers in the world. Guess why Pelosi and company wanted to go there? I’m sure they scheduled a short meeting with the EU, but would have spent their time eating, buying chocolate and shopping at the designer shops on Avenue Louise.”


Sherman January 16, 2019 at 11:02 am In light of Laura loomer’s great move —
How about donations to rent buses and move hundreds, thousands, of homeless and illegals to Pelosi’s, Schumer’s homes? They demand the Homeless & Illegals be “welcomed”? Take video of how THEY “welcome” the destitute. Soros and the Lefties paid to organize and transport those illegals up to Our border … and then CRUELLY ABANDONED them at the border, We should move them the last miles to the Soros, Pelosi, Schumer homes, where they will be lovingly fed, clothed, housed. Be sure to get lots of video of the warm welcome extended by the Loving Liberals.
Remove ALL Taxpayer funded guards, barriers, door locks, gates and fences from all Congressional offices, facilities and homes. If OUR Families don’t get security CONGRESS doesn’t get security. Don’t put up with this crap. If YOUR family is “UNWORTHY” of protection the stinking politicians certainly are unworthy.
What happened to their mantra “IF it saves only ONE life it is worth it”?
YOUR famuily’s life is not “worth it”?! Not to Congress…………
Climb over THEIR walls and see how you are “welcomed”.


Oregon to Become First State to Mandate Universal Home Visits of All Families with Newborn Children

Oregon Governor Kate Brown has submitted her 2-year budget proposal to the Oregon state legislature, and it includes several health initiatives aimed at children’s behavioral (mental) health under the oversight of the Oregon Health Authority and Oregon’s Coordinated Care Organizations, a “uniquely Oregon approach to blending a wide array of health services under one umbrella.”

One of the key pieces of Governor Brown’s legislation is:

the beginning investment in a six-year program to create universal home visits for new parents. (Source.)http://medicalkidnap.com/2019/01/17/oregon-to-become-first-state-to-mandate-universal-home-visits-of-all-families-with-new-born-children/

The Beaverton Valley Times interviewed Patrick Allen, the director of the Oregon Health Authority, who reportedly expressed excitement at the prospect of requiring home visits of all new parents, including adoptive parents:

When the program is complete, every new parent — this includes adoptions — would receive a series of two or three visits by someone like a nurse or other health care practitioner.
The visits could include basic health screenings for babies; hooking parents up with primary care physicians; linking them to other services; and coordinating the myriad childhood immunizations that babies need. (Emphasis added.)

Allen made it clear that they were targeting all children, not just troubled families:

“This isn’t something for people in trouble. This is stuff all kids need.” Allen said.

The state of Oregon sees about 40,000 births per year, and the universal home visit program has apparently already been piloted in Lincoln County.

If you live in Lincoln County Oregon and have experience with this universal home visit program that you would like to share with the public, please contact us at Health Impact News.

More Ways to Take Away Children and Collect Government Funding?

Given what we have reported here at Health Impact News, and especially on our MedicalKidnap.com website, can we really trust that medical professionals employed by the government who come into our homes are going to actually benefit our children and families?

What about the 4th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which the Cornell Law School states “originally enforced the notion that ‘each man’s home is his castle,'” and says:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Is this proposed bill for universal home visits possibly just another way for the State to collect funds, and to potentially remove children from their homes and place them into the lucrative foster care and adoption system?

We have already documented how the foster care system is not primarily about protecting children, but is merely a state-funded child trafficking system. See:

There is already a federally funded home visit program funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HSRA).

The federal program is stated to be “voluntary,” but Oregon seems to want to take it a step further and make government home visits mandatory.

Apparently $400 million has already been allocated to states to fund home visits, and states need to implement programs to receive those funds:

In February 2018, the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program was allocated $400 million per year through fiscal year 2022.
On September 20, 2018, HRSA awarded approximately $361 million in funding to 56 states, territories, and nonprofit organizations to support communities in providing voluntary, evidence-based home visiting services through the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program.
By law, state and territory grantees must spend the majority of their grants to implement evidence-based home visiting models, with up to 25 percent of funding available to implement promising approaches that will undergo rigorous evaluation. (Source.)

Bigger Market for Vaccines? Would Parents Lose Their Children if They Refuse Doctor’s Advice?

Dr. Alanna Braun at Oregon Health & Science University is a pediatrician and a member of the Oregon Pediatrics Society.

She stated in an interview what these home visits would focus on:

If the program becomes reality, all families — regardless of income or area of residence — could see three visits from a nurse. They likely could come when the baby is 3 days old; 2 weeks old; and 2 months old.
At the three-day mark, the visit could focus on such basics as weight loss (which Braun said is typical).
At two weeks, the baby’s weight again could be checked. Babies could get the “heel stick,” the pinprick drawing of blood that checks for metabolic indicators of problems which, at that point, show no outward symptoms.
At two months, nurses and families could discuss the many vaccines that baby’s face. (Emphasis added.)

As we have documented countless times in our Medical Kidnapping stories, parents today face a very real risk of losing their children to Child Protection Services if they dare to question a doctor’s advice regarding medical procedures, or even wanting to seek a second medical opinion.

What would happen to parents who want to delay vaccines, or opt out of them completely at 2 months of age?

Dr. Braun made it clear in her interview that home visits would not just be evaluating the health of the children in the home, but also the parents:

Braun said there’s a “why,” too: To check on the baby, but also to check on the parents.
“Having a new baby at home is stressful for everyone, regardless of income,” she said. “It’s a time of life when most anybody needs some help.”
Nurses could check for signs of postpartum depression, help with questions about breastfeeding, check to make sure there’s a safe place for the baby to sleep and to be bathed and more. (Emphasis added.)

Anyone who has had negative experiences with the Child Welfare System can clearly see that this presents the perfect scenario to remove a child from the home based on someone’s view of the parent’s mental health or ability to parent as the state sees fit.

Once the child is taken and placed into state care through the foster care system, the state is free to order any number of medical services for the child, such as vaccines and psych drugs, and bill those services directly to medicaid without parent approval.

The parents can spend months or even years fighting the system to prove their innocence while trying to get their children back.




Governor Idiot has decided to bankrupt California (well, ok, make it more bankrupt):

It directed California’s massive Medicaid system to negotiate prescription drug prices for all of its 13 million recipients, changing their benefits from a managed-care or HMO approach to one that allows the state to handle all the purchases
Under a proposal expected to be released as part of the state’s budget plan later this week, Newsom will ask the legislature to allow all undocumented immigrant young adults under the age of 26 to participate in the state’s Medicaid plan.
The budget proposal will also contain a plan to increase the federal subsidy for participation in Affordable Care Act policies to families of four making as much as $150,000, and reinstate the mandate requiring people to purchase health care.

Good luck with that.

First, the governor cannot “increase the federal subsidy” for ACA participation, as he cannot compel Washington DC to do anything.  What he can do is spend California’s money on it.

He may be able to compel California residents to buy said policies, but that’ll be challenged.  Of course out there it’ll likely survive any such challenge in the courts.

He can also spend state funds on illegal invading children, but he cannot spend Federal dollars on that, so once again all of this will come out of the State’s coffers.

I don’t know where he thinks he is going to get the money for this, since states cannot run budget deficits.  I presume Newsom believes he can simply raise taxes but California already has ridiculously-high taxes, and this will certainly not make him any friends among those who pay them.

What happens when all those who pay taxes leave and all you have left is people who take?

We’re about to find out.

Oh, and not just in California either:

New York City will begin guaranteeing comprehensive health care to every single resident regardless of someone’s ability to pay or immigration status, an unprecedented plan that will protect the more than half-a-million New Yorkers currently using the ER as a primary provider, Mayor Bill de Blasio said.

Once again, this time on a city level, the Mayor has decided that even if you’re an illegal invader you may have free health care.  This of course is a lie; there is no such thing as free.  There is, however, forcing others to pay for it — in this case somewhere around 300,000 people, all of them illegal invaders.

How long will it before all the people who live and work in NYC and actually pay taxes say “**** that!” and move?

Again, we’re going to find out.



Senior Official in the Trump Administration: Keep the Shutdown Going. We're Getting A Lot More Done Without #TheResistance Sabotaging Us At Every Step.

—Ace of Spades

Only senior officials are at work in many departments, which means #TheResistance of do-nothing bureaucrats -- who are actually doing something under Trump, to wit, subverting and sabotaging his orders -- aren't present.

The official submitted this article to the Daily Caller anonymously.

President Trump can end this abuse. Senior officials can reprioritize during an extended shutdown, focus on valuable results and weed out the saboteurs. We do not want most employees to return, because we are working better without them. Sure, we empathize with families making tough financial decisions, like mine, and just like private citizens who have to find other work and bring competitive value every day, while paying more than a third of their salary in federal taxes.President Trump has created more jobs in the private sector than the furloughed federal workforce. Now that we are shut down, not only are we identifying and eliminating much of the sabotage and waste, but we are finally working on the president’s agenda.
President Trump does not need Congress to address the border emergency, and yes, it is an emergency. Billions upon billions of hard-earned tax dollars are still being dumped into foreign aid programs every year that do nothing for America’s interest or national security. The president does not need congressional funding to deconstruct abusive agencies who work against his agenda. This is a chance to effect real change, and his leverage grows stronger every day the shutdown lasts.
The president should add to his demands, including a vote on all of his political nominees in the Senate. Send the career appointees back. Many are in the 5 percent of saboteurs and resistance leaders.
To: The Victors of the Recent National Elections
From: Your gun-owning constituents
Subject: The so-called "Gun Show Loophole" and Private Property

Congratulations. You have just been swept into power. Enjoy the feeling.

But come January, the special interests who put you there are going to be banging on your door asking for various favors. Some of them are going to be demanding more gun control legislation, among them a law to close the so-called "gun show loophole", which means to restrict one person from selling his or her private property to another person in a private transaction.

Heretofore, the bumbling GOP has at least been able to fend off these attempts at our liberties, but those corrupt incompetents have now been justifiably swept from power for their other numerous political sins. 

You call this "reasonable regulation."

We call it tyranny, for not even King George III was so grasping. But since you won the election, it will be your candidates who take the oath and pass the bills.  It is the darker angels of YOUR nature we are seeking to save you from, as I will explain below.

The hubris derived from your own smashing electoral victory may incline you to listen to those voices demanding that you seize the moment for more gun control. If I may, let me explain the possible personal, unintended consequences of such an act to you.

There are in your district, in your state and indeed all over the country, a great number of gun owners just like me. I suppose if you added us all up there at least a million or two of us.

Maybe more, maybe less, but once you get into numbers like that, what's a million more or less?

We are the 'cold, dead hands" types, the men and women who have sworn, as the old bumper sticker said, "When guns are outlawed, I'll be an outlaw." We have fought a political delaying action against the enemies of our traditional 2nd Amendment rights for decades now. Indeed, we have been shoved back from the free exercise of our historic firearms liberty for 70 plus years.

Now it is plain that we have lost the argument at the polls.

No matter.

You feel a natural pride at having swept the GOP from the House. But you should know that in doing so you have removed any hope we ever had of successfully defending our right to armed self-defense in the political arena. You will also take up, and I'm certain you want to pass, the Fairness Doctrine to shut up the talk radio hosts who have so bedeviled you these past thirty years. As well, you want open borders for illegal aliens, which you believe will make any further conservative success in national elections impossible. Mainstream media and internet social media only allow one point of view- yours. You  think you have a mandate for whatever you do. And yet...

Consider where this puts us. We will no longer have the possibility of stopping further attacks on our God-given liberties politically. We will not even be able to vent our frustration on social media. You call it "hate speech regulation" of the Internet. And in the middle of this you will try to disarm us by means of a "gun show loophole" bill- a restriction on the right of Private Property-, or a new tougher "assault weapons ban" or a ban on "assault weapons ammunition" and "armor piercing bullets" which will include simple hunting ammunition, or probably a combination of all three. Perhaps you will stealthily try to do these things by quietly having the ATF manipulate the regulatory process.

Quiet or not, we will notice.

You will do this because you think you can do it without political or personal retribution. I write you today to tell you that if you do so, you will be as wrong as you could possibly be.

You believe that if you pass a law backed by the threat of federal violence for non-compliance, that we will do what you order without resistance. You believe this because you are extrapolating our anticipated behavior from your own cowardice, You know that YOU would never do such a thing, so we won't either. This is a dangerous assumption on your part, perhaps fatally so. For if the discredited Republicans no longer protect us from you, then they no longer protect you from us, either.

You've got us surrounded, you poor bastards.

Remember that we consider our rights merely codified by the Constitution. They are, we sincerely believe, God-given and inalienable. Remember too that we are willing to die for our liberties rather than surrender them up meekly. Remember as well that men and women who are willing to die for their principles are most often willing to kill for them too.

What can this possibly have to do with you?

Well, it's like this. We have been doing a lot of thinking about what we would do if we ever found ourselves in this situation, and after considerable thought we have decided we agree with Bill Clinton. Back in 1999, when he was trying to pressure the Serbians into giving up Kosovo, then President Clinton expanded American rules of war to include -- as legitimate targets of deadly force -- the politicians and the news media that shaped and supported his enemy's war policy.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but if you force us into resistance by further circumscribing our rights -- by sending federal police to our doors to enforce your will -- can't those same Clintonian rules of engagement be applied to you?

Oh, we could certainly defend ourselves by shooting back at the hapless instruments of your tyranny -- the sons and daughters of other Americans who happen to be in federal service.

But wouldn't it be wiser for us -- after the first, second or third time this happens -- to adopt Clinton's policy and go after the people who sent them? That is, to seek out the bureaucrats and politicians who decided to start the war? And, like Clinton, should we target the media talking heads and newspaper editors who clamored for it in the first place?

The advocates of citizen disarmament are probably willing to fight a war down to the last dead ATF agent, but are YOU willing to fight one past the first dead politician? And how many dead editors will it take to change an editorial board policy?

If you pass new gun bans we will find out.

But, one wonders, who would cry over a dead congressman or senator who voted to take people's liberty, property and lives? Especially after innocent victims of his predatory law-making were already littering the streets. You may recall the already lower-than-a-snake's-belly position in the polls that Congress currently holds.

*Edited and updated excerpt from Absolved.



You can’t arm slaves and expect them to remain slaves, and similarly, you can’t disarm free citizens and expect them to remain free.


Is Ruth Vader Ginzburg leaving us for good ? (and I DO mean GOOD ! )

Keep your fingers crossed...

On Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s fourth consecutive day of absence from proceedings, one can’t help but pause to appreciate the truly Pravda-levels of progressive propaganda. According to cat-lady repositories like Bustle, Salon, and Huff-Po, the Notorious RVG is a “bad-ass” and a “super-human” who works out every day, and will no doubt be back to work following this most recent “health scare.”

Unfortunately, some things can’t be meme’d into reality. The meat-hook reality is that everyone’s favorite activist law-giver is staring at long odds after a fall in November of 2018 that resulted in 3 broken ribs. In the course of treating these injuries, it was discovered unfortunately that Ginsburg was also suffering from lung cancer, which resulted in the removal of one lobe of one of her lungs, also known as a lobectomy.

Levantine reporters and D-list feminist celebrities immediately came out of the woodwork to virtue signal and show brand-enhancing support. Former softcore porn actress and ubiquitous Twitter-bitch Alyssa Milano even offered her vital organs to squeeze a few more years out of Ginsburg, presumably to keep her on the bench through the end of the Bad Orange Man era. While Milano may know a thing or two about having someone else’s organs in her body, medical statistics say she may be better served to hold out for a recipient with a longer shelf-life.

According to a 2014 medical literature review,patients over 65 years of age who suffer a broken rib face a 34% chance of contracting pneumonia and an initial 19% mortality rate. In instances where more than one rib is broken, chances of pneumonia increase 27% with each additional broken rib, along with a commensurate increase in mortality rates. These odds are confirmed on the Mayo Clinic website, which details not only that being of advanced age nearly doubles mortality rates (1.98), but adds that fracture of 3 or more ribs doubles the odds of death (2.02), and pre-existing disease, such as, y’know, lung cancer, more than doubles the odds of death (2.43). No doubt, the Notorious RVG is getting the best care your tax-shekels can buy. At this point however, especially given that Ginsburg is now missing work with no word on when she may return, her chances of "dodging the reaper" for the next 12 months tops out around 30%. Conversely, the Dissident Right is looking at a 70-80% chance of witnessing the timely departure of an insufferable kosher Law-Goblin, the demise of a feminist idol (and truly EVIL person), and yet another empty seat in the highest court in the land. Some folks would call that a trifecta. ! ! ! ...or an answer to PRAYERS...



California Governor plans to Put Tax on Tap Water

In order to help disadvantaged communities obtain safe and affordable drinking water, (which the government had taken control over decades ago), California Governor Gavin Newsom is proposing a new statewide water tax.

He is going to out tax Governor Moonbeam. 

In the newly-released 2019-20 budget, Newsom calls for the creation of a “safe and affordable drinking water fund” that would “enable the State Water Resources Control Board to assist communities, particularly disadvantaged communities, in paying for the short-term and long-term costs of obtaining access to safe and affordable drinking water.”

A McClatchy investigation from 2018 found that 6 million Californians rely on water providers that violated state standards at some point in the last six years. According to the report, the majority of Californians that lack safe drinking water live in the Southern San Joaquin Valley and the Mojave Desert.

The details of the proposed tax are unknown, but a similar proposal was abandoned by then-Governor Jerry Brown last year after failing to garner enough support in the legislature.

California residents would have been taxed 95 cents a month, or $11.40 a year, under that plan.

On Friday, Newsom took his Cabinet on a trip to the Central Valley to hear from residents who lack clean drinking water.



The advocates of the disarmament of the American populace such as the aforementioned CSGV always begin by saying that no group of citizenry can oppose the might of the federal government because of the vast array of weaponry including aircraft, artillery and even nuclear weapons that the federals could bring to bear if they are opposed trumps any number of armed "insurrectionists" with rifles. This ludicrous argument is not only contradicted by many examples throughout history but begs the moral question of resistance to a predatory government itself. If a government is so depraved as to use nuclear weapons against its own people on its own soil, it will not long survive the condemnation of even the people who otherwise support it. The same goes for artillery and air strikes, even so called "surgical, decapitation operations." (More about that in a minute.) Such weapons are, in 4GW, merely expensive but useless, appendages, especially in an uncontrolled media environment.

The fact that CSGV and its collectivist familiars even suggest the nuclear boogeyman as a real threat by the federal government merely marks them as moral pariahs -- inciters of holocaust -- and tells you everything you need to know about such people. THEY are apparently the ones who are willing to see millions of their own citizens dead in pursuit of gun control and a government monopoly on violence. They are bloodthirsty people indeed.

The utility -- practical or moral -- of using even precision-guided munitions from artillery or aircraft in a civil war upon your own people, in your own territory and athwart your own logistics tail is also militarily problematic, especially in a media environment that includes the Internet, even more especially in a country such as the U.S. which depends upon it for so much of its own economic activity that it cannot be totally shut down.

The thing is, once started, the regime will find it almost impossible to stop on any terms besides their own unconditional surrender as they would be fighting an enraged but dispersed network insurgency. It is likely that after a few weeks of such blood-letting, the administration will be unable to find anybody left alive with sufficient influence among the insurgents with whom they can negotiate an end to the horror. The fact of the matter is that they would have done their best to kill the folks they would need to stop what they started.

And they will want to stop it, oh, yes, out of concern for their own miserable hides if nothing else.

For they will have provoked a conflict that will not be directed at the war-fighters, the grunts, even those in the outnumbered federal police, but rather at the war-makers, i.e. themselves.



France's Macron Reeling as Tough Stance Against Protests Backfires

PARIS (Reuters) – Emmanuel Macron intended to start the new year on the offensive against the ‘yellow vest’ protesters. Instead, the French president is reeling from more violent street demonstrations.
What began as a grassroots rebellion against diesel taxes and the high cost of living has morphed into something more perilous for Macron – an assault on his presidency and French institutions.
The anti-government protesters on Saturday used a forklift truck to force their way into a government ministry compound, torched cars near the Champs Elysees and in one violent skirmish on a bridge over the Seine punched and kicked riot police officers to the ground.
The French authorities’ struggle to maintain order during the weekend protests raises questions not just over policing tactics but also over how Macron responds, as he prepares to bring in stricter rules for unemployment benefits and cut thousands of public sector jobs.
On Sunday evening, Macron wrote on Twitter: “Once again, the Republic was attacked with extreme violence – its guardians, its representatives, its symbols.”
His administration had hardened its stance against the yellow vests after the protest movement appeared to have lost momentum over the Christmas holidays.
The government would not relent in its pursuit of reforms to reshape the economy, government spokesman Benjamin Griveaux said on Friday, branding the remaining protesters agitators seeking to overthrow the government.
Twenty-four hours later, he was fleeing his office out of a back door as protesters invaded the courtyard and smashed up several cars. “It wasn’t me who was attacked,” he later said. “It was the Republic.”



Apple bans Christian app, other tech giants soon to follow as war on Christianity accelerates

The online war against free speech, free thought and association continues as tech giants continue to target and ban “dangerous” text, audio, and video. According to a recent BBC report, Apple has removed a Christian app because its teachings on homosexuality are “dangerous.”

According to the report, an activist group called “Truth Wins Out” pleaded with Apple to remove a Christian app that spreads “dangerous” speech and ideas. The offended activist group convinced Apple to remove Living Hope Ministries from its app store. Now the activist group is petitioning Google and Amazon to follow suit and ban Living Hope Ministries from their platforms, too. “Google and Amazon [must] immediately stop selling and promoting this app, which dehumanizes LGBT people,” says the petition, signed by 356 supporters. Google is preparing to remove the app if it violates Google’s “ban on content that incites hatred.”

Living Hope Ministries is a Biblical ministry that teaches “sexual wholeness” for various groups, including youth, men, women, and spouses. The ministry helps people have healthy sexual relationships and a “more intimate relationship with Jesus.” The ministry has changed many lives for the better, including youth who don’t want to act out on sexual impulses or be defined by past sexual decisions. Living Hope Ministries is anything but a “hate organization.” The app helps people who struggle with their faith and their feelings.

“We help people understand who they are in Christ” said Ricky Chelette, the ministry’s executive director. “We only help those individuals who are seeking us.”

Gay rights activists are especially offended by a Living Hope Ministries article titled, “How do I help My Gay Friend?” The activist group says any messages that seek to change homosexuals are toxic because they portray homosexuality as an addiction that needs to be fixed. Obviously, gay rights groups are going to take issue with Christian ministries; this is perfectly fine until the gay rights groups gain the power to restrict Christians’ ability to speak, think, and associate on the internet.

What if Christian ministries petitioned to ban gay rights and Big Tech discriminated against gays?

Do gay rights groups have the right to take away the rights of Christian ministries? In a free market of ideas, the answer is a resounding NO. When tech giants such as Apple, Google, and Amazon cow-tow to offended groups and dictate the marketplace via censorship, accountability must ensue. All Americans have the right to engage in commerce, live out their purpose, and teach the tenants of their religious beliefs, no matter how many activist groups are offended.

If Christian groups were the ones banning gay rights groups online, the entire media would call out Christians for committing “hate crimes,” “bigotry,” and “discrimination.” Ironically, it’s the gay rights groups pleading for bans on Christian content, and the gay rights groups are getting away with it. Instead of taking a stand against bigotry, Big Tech is sponsoring an all-out censorship war against Christians, discriminating against Christian beliefs and damaging their outreach in the most fascist way.

If Apple can get away with banning the Living Hope Ministries app, a dangerous precedent has been set. Any “offensive” Christian apps could be removed next. If apps display offensive scriptures or if apps do not embrace homosexuality, they could be nixed. The same censorship rule could be applied to all Christian teachings in Google searches and Amazon products.


“Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.” – H.L. Mencken

What is civilization? It is expectation. It is shared protocol. It isn’t so much about what thing is done but how one does that thing. The savage shows up at the local Wal-Mart in pajamas. The civilized man shows up dressed within the socially acceptable norms.Aha! But what if pajamas are within the social norms? Then you’re in a civilization of savages. See, we have this notion that civilization is related to what we think of as civilized, but that is a lie. The cannibals of the darkest jungle are a civilization. But they are not civilized.

These are different concepts. Most all of us come from some civilization, but to be considered civilized, you must abide by the protocols of the civilization you are currently inhabiting.

And make no mistake. All civilizations are not equal. Equality does not exist on this earth. For example, you may admire the pygmies of New Guinea, but they haven’t launched a space program, have they? They have produced no great works of art, have they? Can you name their great composers?

But am I not judging them by the standards of my own civilization? Indeed, I am. Because I happen to very much prefer my own civilization. To paraphrase Jules his own bad self… Humans may taste like bacon and pork chops, but I would never know because I would never eat the filthy…   and so it goes. No doubt the savages of the islands would think me an idiot for the refusal.

When God began His great work of setting the Israelites apart from the world, He did so by giving them rules. Boundaries. Because that is what civilization is. It is a set of boundaries and expectations that define a community. A society where anything and everything is acceptable is not a society at all. It is base savagery.

And that brings us to our war…  The Culture War.

At its heart the Culture War is about the rules that make up our civilization. The progressive Left has been working to loosen and change these rules and expectations for centuries… and we on the Right have let them.

No more.

We are not Conservatives. We are not the mere weights dragging along…  slowing down the plow. We are not the resistance. We are here to put those rules back where they belong. We are here to take back our birthrights. We are here to safeguard and rebuild Western Civilization.

We are the Takers.

If you find yourself thinking about hoisting the Black Flag Mr. Mencken spoke of, then please, allow me to be the first to say…

Welcome to The Hard Right.



Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 54fc2d No.4633937 📁
" target="_blank">https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/styles/img/fold.png"/>
Jan 6 2019 18:57:01 (EST)

Remember when D's and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] pushed mass fear that POTUS would start WWIII re: North Korea?
POTUS > PEACE on the Korean P > NO further missile tests or U enrichment.
New narrative created.
Refusal to provide coverage of successes.
Remember when D's and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] pushed a stock market collapse if POTUS was elected?
POTUS E + policies > largest gains recorded in market's history
New narrative created.
Refusal to provide coverage of successes.
[Use FED to inc rates to counter growth and project POTUS blame]
Remember when D's and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] pushed complete economic collapse if POTUS was elected?
POTUS E + policies > lowest unemployment records in history + record jobs/GDP growth
New narrative created.
Refusal to provide coverage of successes.
[Deploy and use 'racism' 'sexism' and every other ….'ism' to counter potential Black/Hispanic pop support]
Why do D's and the FAKE NEWS media [+FAKEWOOD] continually push the 'IMPEACH' narrative if impeachment requires 2/3rd SENATE VOTE TO ENACT (odds of that?)?
Do they push this FAKE NARRATIVE to project a supposed 'supportable w/ evidence' wrongdoing to their BASE (confirmation bias)?
Accusations never supported by facts?
The list goes on and on…..
(What if HRC won and appointed 2+ crooked SCJs?)
(The Last Resort)

Jan 6 2019 15:09:09 (EST)

When will the public discover that Ted Cruz was also illegally SURV (pre_POTUS_R nomination)?
C_A 'illegal' SURV > members of Congress?
C_A 'illegal' SURV > members of the Press?
" target="_blank">https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/styles/img/fold.png"/>
" target="_blank">https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/styles/img/fold.png"/>
Who ordered the SURV?
What justification was provided to AUTH SURV of ELECTED OFFICIALS?
SURV fall under scope of FISA warrant or internal to Dept or outsourced to FVEY?
Reality check - friend or foe, we all spy on each other?
Should we be spying on ourselves?
Should we be tasking others to spy on ourselves in order to avoid U.S. law?
Was FVEY established & designed by the INTEL COMM as a backchannel SURV apparatus to avoid domestic laws triggers and Congressional/Senate oversight?
What keylogs exist to monitor FVEY intel collection?
What ability do former GOV officials have re: ability to access C_LEVEL FVEY offshore data?
How did HRC gain access to highest CLAS SAPs (closed system access) and able to transfer to remote/home server?
(Q above should scare every single American)
How did CHINA locate primary C_A assets within CHINA [187]?
Money buys POWER.
No punishment [Brennan] by HUSSEIN ADMIN re: SURV of Senate etc?
Logical thinking, why?
" target="_blank">https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/styles/img/fold.png"/>
Justice Dept declines to pursue?
Fake News media limits exposure to public?
NSA targeted?
Where did @Snowden work prior to NSA contractor ACCEPT?
What SENIOR LEVEL GOV/C_A OFFICIAL rec @Snowden for NSA contractor OFF/TAR position?
Post public release of CLAS NSA PRO > U1?
Where is @Snowden today?
What country was involved in U1?
If real target country was VENEZUELA or ECUADOR - why didn't @Snowden take a direct flight from Hong Kong to those locations?
How many direct flights run daily from HK to V&E?
If @Snowden was C_A/NSA would he not understand (simple logic) going public PRIOR TO END DESTINATION SAFETY would 'LIMIT' ACTIVE PASSPORT TRAVEL ABILITY due to block_DEREG?
Why then would @Snowden route through RUSSIA?
Was RUSSIA final destination?
Was RUSSIA true destination?
Could @Snowden be seen releasing CLAS programs/intel FROM INSIDE OF RUSSIA?
What role did BRENNAN PLAY in the @Snowden leaks re: NSA?
What was BRENNAN's background re: SAUDI ARABIA?
Does the C_A hold blackmail on political leaders?
Does the C_A protect those who protect them?
Why are ex C_A contractors running for office?
How many ex C_A contractors are currently in office?
Hello, [AS].
Once an agent, always an agent.


Laos has been tightening restrictions on Christian practice as an unwelcome Western influence, mirroring the situation of other Asian communist nations.

During the Christmas holidays, incidents of arrests, harassment, and censure of expressions of the Christian feast were reported around the country.

Nine police officers raided a Nakanong Village Christmas service on December 29 and arrested three church leaders on charges of illegally gathering for worship in the country’s southern Savannakhet province without government permission.

After taking the church leaders to the Phin district police station, officers returned to the village and arrested four more Christians and took them to the station as well. The officials later destroyed the stage and sound system at the village church and cut off its power, as well as seizing three cell phones.

Earlier in December, authorities arrested five other Christians in the Non Soung village of the Phin district after a group of Christians invited a pastor from a neighboring village to organize a Christmas celebration for them. Security forces arrested four of the Christians from Non Soung village as well as the visiting pastor.

Government regulations reportedly only allow Christians to participate in Christmas celebrations in their own village.

“In general, Christians are still restricted in this district,” said an anonymous district official. “They are not allowed to teach from the Bible or to spread their religion to others because Christianity is the religion of the Europeans and Americans.”

In its most recent report, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) noted that in some parts of Laos, “state and nonstate actors continued to threaten, harass, attack, or arrest Christians because of their faith.”

The communist government of Laos “tightly manages religious groups much in the same way it controls any individual or group it perceives could deviate from the state’s agenda or who expresses dissent or criticism,” the report stated.

In 2018, USCIRF placed Laos on its Tier 2 “for engaging in or tolerating religious freedom violations that meet at least one of the elements of the ‘systematic, ongoing, egregious’ standard.”

In its 2018 World Watch List, Open Doors USA, a Christian watchdog group, ranked Laos as the 20th worst nation in the world for Christian persecution.

Open Doors said that due to the Communist Party’s tight grip on this country, “religion is seen as a hostile element,” and “Christianity, in particular, is considered a Western influence and especially dangerous.”

“The government has recently made efforts to increase the monitoring of illegal house churches with the help of registered churches, resulting in the arrest and detention of Christian believers,” the group said.

The report noted the arrest of believers caught engaging in illegal church activities, or in possession of “Bibles or other Christian literature.” Other Christians have been “threatened, fined or beaten in an attempt to make them renounce their faith.”

Christians comprise about three percent of the population of seven million people



Newly elected Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema refused to be sworn in on a Bible, opting, instead, to place her right hand on a book of laws, including the U.S Constitution and the Arizona Constitution.

The book Sen. Sinema placed her hand on to be sworn in came from the Library of Congress, her office told the Arizona Republic.

“Kyrsten always gets sworn in on a Constitution simply because of her love for the Constitution,” the senator’s office lied.

There is at least one other reason Sinema refused to place her hand on the Bible. According to the Pew Research Center for Religion and Public Life, the Arizonan is the only member of the Senate who does not identify as a member of a religion.

Sinema, who started her political career as a member of the Green Party, also identifies as a Sodomite. She is only the second member of the Senate to identify as a Sodomite.

Despite her current claim to love the U.S. Constitution, in her work with left-wing groups in the early 2000s, Sinema was far less solicitous of the law of the land. In fact, she was quoted in 2002 as saying she thought it was acceptable that anarchists and Antifa types perpetrated violence, carried weapons, and destroyed property in pursuit of the extremist goals.

“When AAPJ attended May Day (sponsored by the Phoenix Anarchist Coalition), we knew that their guidelines differ from ours,” the Washington Examiner wrote of an email Sinema sent in 2002. “They are okay with weapons and property destruction in some instances, and so those of us who chose to attend the event knew that it would be inappropriate to ask someone to not destroy property or to carry a weapon. 

(Huh ?)



The 116th Congress is comprised of the lowest number of Christian lawmakers since Pew Research Center began collecting data in 1961 and is a slightly more religiously diverse body than the previous Congress.

Christians now represent 88 percent of the current Congress, according to Pew Research, a 3 percent drop from the 91 percent of the 115th Congress who identified as Christian. Anglicans/Episcopalians saw the greatest losses, dropping from 44 to 35 members. Catholics lost five seats. Mormons lost three. Christian Scientists lost one seat, meaning there are no longer any Christian Scientists in Congress.  

At the same time, there are now more nondenominational or Christians of unspecified affiliation in Congress. On the whole, Congress members identifying with evangelical or unspecified nondenominational churches gained 18 seats, bringing their representation up to 80 seats.  



ABORTION is THE leading cause of death in 2018

More human beings died in abortions than any other cause of death in 2018, a new report indicates.

A heartbreaking reminder about the prevalence of abortion, statistics compiled by Worldometers indicate that there were nearly 42 million abortions world-wide in 2018. The independent site collects data from governments and other reputable organizations and then reports the data, along with estimates and projections, based on those numbers.

Breitbart contrasted the abortion numbers to other causes of death, including cancer, HIV/AIDS, traffic accidents and suicide, and found that abortions far outnumbered every other cause.

Here’s more from the report:

As of December 31, 2018, there have been some 41.9 million abortions performed in the course of the year, Worldometers revealed. By contrast, 8.2 million people died from cancer in 2018, 5 million from smoking, and 1.7 million died of HIV/AIDS. …

It also records the total number of abortions in the world, based on the latest statistics on abortions published by the World Health Organization (WHO).

Globally, just under a quarter of all pregnancies (23 percent) were ended by abortion in 2018, and for every 33 live births, ten infants were aborted.



IN THE CONGO, EBOLA IS SPREADING TO URBAN AREASThe current Ebola flare-up is cause for more serious concern than first thought. According to Medicines Sans Frontieres, the containment zone for the latest infections appears spreading to north Kivu, including the urban areas of Butembo and Kalenguta. While the number of cases reported was low, the infections are expected to rise rapidly, creating a potential health crisis crossing the border into Uganda and Rwanda. Currently 440 have reported ebola-like symptoms with 392 confirmed cases.

“We are very concerned by the epidemiological situation in the Butembo area. We now know that this outbreak will last and that we must increase our efforts to get it under control,” says John Johnson, MSF project coordinator in Butembo.

Complicating the efforts of medical aid workers is the ongoing strife on the ground. Being historically unstable, the most recent civil unrest sliding in to small scale warfare is the refusal of current president Joseph Kabila to leave office. The conflict has led to the recruitment and use of child soldiers, a common practice in that part of the world. This level of instability and brutality obviously has negative consequences for competent aid workers, just as concerned about their safety as they are treating the afflicted areas, especially among females.

While the MSF is optimistic, the potential spread rate to neighboring nations is alarming- and with those nations being nearly as unstable as the Congo, presents a potential humanitarian crisis worse than that of the 2014-2016 west African outbreak. As my source from the Red Cross noted, we’re only seeing the tip of the iceberg. I pray he’s wrong but its something to keep an eye on nonetheless.



Trump standing firm while GOP establishment pee in their panties

That's because the GOP establishment are used to getting their asses kicked by Democrats because they're a bunch of punks. 

That's why the GOP base chose Trump to lead!  It's as simple as that.One of the most tumultuous weeks in President Trump’s turbulent two years in office has turned up the spotlight on divisions between the White House and Republicans — particularly on foreign policy.

Trump in the last week has announced the removal of all U.S. troops from Syria and a reduction in the U.S. presence in Afghanistan, two decisions that represented a reversal from more than a decade of GOP strategy in the war against terrorism. The top U.S. envoy in the fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) resigned.

The decisions on Syria and Afghanistan contributed to Defense Secretary James Mattis’s resignation — a move that rattled lawmakers in both parties who had long seen the respected general as a calming or even stabilizing influence on an administration viewed at times as erratic.

On Sunday, Trump, seemingly stung by that narrative, announced Mattis would be out on Jan. 1 — two months earlier than previously planned.

He also took a swipe at the Pentagon chief, casting his decision to make him secretary of Defense as a “second chance.”

“When President Obama ingloriously fired Jim Mattis, I gave him a second chance,” Trump wrote in a tweet on Saturday night. “Some thought I shouldn’t, I thought I should. Interesting relationship-but I also gave all of the resources that he never really had. Allies are very important-but not when they take advantage of U.S.”

Mattis had made it clear that the president did not “align” with his own “strongly held” views on the value of alliances such as NATO and the anti-ISIS coalition and standing firm against adversaries such as Russia and China.

Senate Republicans saw the president effectively force a shutdown of parts of the government over his demands for $5 billion in funding for his wall on the Mexican border, after the Senate has passed a bill without extra border funding by voice vote to keep it open.

And all of this took place as the stock market crumbled, falling in part on worries about Trump’s trade policies. Reports circulated over the weekend that the president was mulling the firing of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who he has blamed for interest rate hikes.



63% of households in the U.S. headed by non-citizens are on some form of welfare. Welfare for illegal aliens has "insane" written all over it. Welfare is the real "better life" they're looking for. A lot of 'em have two fake IDs, one for their job, the other for the welfare office, free health care, etc. Some working citizens who pay for this make less than the illegals, and without all the freebies. The "invasion" is over. Welcome to the occupation.(from www.woodpilereort.com

[How do you deal with occupiers ?



Dear Editor:

So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because the people now in question aren't being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry.

Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.

They had waved good bye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity.

Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany , Italy , France and Japan . None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan . They were defending the United States of America as one people.

When we liberated France , no one in those villages were looking for the French-American or the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.

And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life. I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.

And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty , it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about dismantling the United States just yet.


Rosemary LaBonte



If the government won't do it, WE THE PEOPLE will have to protect the borders. If the government won't do it, WE THE PEOPLE will have to remove the lawbreakers from their positions of power. If the government won't do it, WE THE PEOPLE will have to kick out the enemies of our Constitutional Republic.  And you probably won't like the methods used.

Capish, democrats , RINOs and NeverTrumpers ?


"The Constitution is not an instrument for government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government--lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." -- Patrick Henry


CAN GOOGLE TRACK YOU with your phone ?

If  you have a smart phone, Google can know everywhere you go and what you are doing. WATCH THIS CREEPY VIDEO.

One reason not to carry a 'smart' phone.


Cali wants to tax computer texting ( ! )

Massachusetts Governor Ignores Court Order To Reinstate Gun Permits

In this country, and at every state level, we have three branches of government: The executive, the legislative, and the judicial.

These three branches are supposed to keep one another in check. There are mechanisms put in place to try to make sure that happens. We call these “checks and balances,” and it’s a big chunk of why our republic has survived as long as it has.

Now, you probably already know all this. You learned it in high school government class, if not before then.

Want to know who didn’t learn it? Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker.

Governor Charlie Baker on Monday defended his administration’s role in a legal battle over firearm licenses, arguing the state was required to tell local police chiefs that hundreds of people should have their permits revoked at the urging of federal officials.

But the stance continues to meet resistance at the district court level, where at least seven judges — including two last week — have ordered that gun licenses be reinstated, with one dismissing the reliance on the state’s legal position as “capricious.”

The issue has drawn new attention since the Globe reported that the state was resisting orders from judges who charged that officials had overstepped their legal authority by urging local officials to pull the gun licenses of roughly 340 people, some of whom were convicted of misdemeanors decades ago.

Despite the court orders, the administration has refused to reinstate the licenses, potentially exposing the state to litigation.



Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable- John F. Kennedy  [Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and others who do not allow dissenting opinions, such as SJWs and colleges, should  keep that in mind as they attempt to disappear the notion of FREE SPEECH. Keep it up and we will PUT YOU OUT OF BUSINESS.]-Ed

With all of the democrats/RINOs/NeverTrumpers' shouting about endless investigations and impeachment- I have one thing to say to you- IF YOU Godless abominations WANT A FRENCH REVOLUTION, JUST KEEP IT UP. YOU WILL GET A NIGHT OF THE LONG KNIVES, AND THEN A FRENCH-STYLE REVOLUTION THAT WILL NOT STOP UNTIL EVERY ONE OF YOU IS DRIVEN OUT OF OUR COUNTRY OR YOU ARE ALL DEAD.

Now back to our regular programming.

Have a nice day but REMEMBER WHAT I SAID.

A few weeks ago, over 300 million lottery tickets were sold in 4 days. Within hours of the drawing, lottery officials knew how many winning tickets were sold, and where the winning tickets were sold, down to the specific store locations. 

Our election system is broken ON PURPOSE.

In the last decade, every single House Democrat sent to prison for financial crimes was a Congressional Black Caucus member. In the last twenty years, it’s been over 80% of them


A little prayer- Dear Lord, we are humble men. We were soldiers in our youth and we are old men now. We have seen war and we do not seek it. We have also seen tyranny and oppression and know that these things are worse than war. Please guide our hands and direct the course of our nation, restore our country and its ideals, its freedoms, and our nation's faith in God. Amen******************************

Where is the MONEY ?https://missingmoney.solari.com*********************

Code is Free Speech

https://codeisfreespeech.com ***

Don’t Get Distracted By The Trump/Fed Soap Opera – The Crash Will Continue, by Brandon Smith


“Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.” – H.L. Mencken



Do Not Make Us Take Out Our Combat Rifles and Use Them

Posted on January 28, 2018

 I’m saying it outright, Do Not Make Us Take Out Our Combat Rifles and Use Them. It is the last thing you want. It is the last thing you will know. It is the last thing We wish to do. When We have to, there will be nothing for it but to rid our land, our communities, our country, our way of life, of you who could not simply leaves us alone. It is all we have ever really wanted. To live freely, be pleasant, create humble wealth, tangible things that are our own, love our family, love our neighbor, our land, our country, our way of life. There was enough for everyone, and given a little more time, more than can be imagined. Wealth so profound most of the world would become wealthy & prosperous because there was no limits.

What unbelievable fools you are. And you think you are so elite. You are not. You are nothing of the sort. You are the most selfish greedy petty resentful egotistic arrogant motherfuckers imaginable. Once you are gone, and believe it, you will be, for no decent Christian people can continence your existence for long, you will be remembered till times end as the most foolish greedy idiots the human race has ever produced. That you totally blew it. You had it all if you just left us alone to your scheming and treason.

But no, you could not. You got greedy, nothing you stole, denied, extorted, decreed, diktated, forced, and imposed, was ever enough for you.

The more you stole the more you wanted.

And now, you put our backs up against a wall, and you have attempted to take it all right down to the seed corn, and whats left you haven’t put your greasy meathooks on. To add insult to injury you have made us into your version of the Bolshevik’s Kulak’s.

When our guns come out there is no stopping us. You can’t stop what you have sowed, you will reap the wind, it will end you all, to the last one of you. We will hunt you down, you can not hide or find safety from the storm you created.

It is the nature of us, our tolerance, our ability to live and let live, most important is we can turn the other cheek. There are limits, and you have trespassed far beyond the pale. Our reluctance to begin what can be settled without rivers of blood is our savings grace and all which save your worthless souls.

We sit here watching you prevaricate, dissimulate, create falsehoods out of whole cloth, and we wonder at the spectacle of your foolishness, and are you going to squirm out of this, and in your hubris double down, take revenge on the helpless and innocent of us, lash out in your stunning arrogance, to take “vengeance” on us for defying and resisting you?

You have no power over us any more. In your thirst for ultimate power you have lost all power.

You have lost all legitimacy. All respect. Lost Our blessing. But most of all we withdraw our consent of and for you. The next step is we shoot you. Its that plain. It has come to that point. And it is on the minds and in the thoughts of millions of us. There is no sugar coating this. We gave you every opportunity, every chance, all the benefit of our doubt.

Be warned. If you don’t stop now while there is a chance to end your tyranny and treason without shedding a drop of blood, and simply going away, you have no recourse from us. But we know you well, better than you know yourselves.

Just try us.

If it isn’t crystal clear where those whose presume to rule over us without our consent nor care about what we believe in, nor have any interest save their own rotten hides, what happens to us dirt people because of the inevitable cluster-fuck of the unintended consequences of their tyranny, there is this simple truth:

Where they go wrong is they underestimate us as people of virtue and principle. Granted, it is even understated and downplayed by ourselves, but that only is because we are humble and only ask to be left alone to our basic needs and desires. It isn’t asking much, especially because the truth is we dirt people who are all who pays for this civilization. It is our labors which create the true wealth, everyone else simply has their hand in our pockets.

Be that as it may, it does not diminish anything about our selves, if anything it is part and parcel of what makes us the only legitimate demographic which exists, everyone else are either free loaders of strip mining our wealth.

At some point somebody is going to say one day they have had enough, and they will ignite a grass roots wild fire. We already see it in France and as it begins to spread across the Continent. Yes, they have had enough also.

Something to give proper thought and respect, and prepare our hearts and minds for. Because in no uncertain terms, this defiance and revolution is inevitable. The course of the dynamics of history in the making was set long ago. So the question will come to you regardless of your position, are you going to be a part of throwing off the chains of this tyranny breathing down our throats, and make positive change happen.

No matter what all, do not give up your guns.



The Techniques and Strategies of Confiscating Guns

We will begin with a reprint of the email sent to me by someone who is well-versed in gun confiscation techniques and strategies. He did not tell me his law enforcement affiliation, but I can almost guarantee that he works for DHS. Why? Because most of the techniques are Nazi strategies in origin. Markus Wolf, a former Nazi, who started the East German Stasi, was paid $5 million to set up DHS, so it makes the most sense. Further, most of the strategies were overtly practiced in the martial law crackdown immediately following the Boston Marathon Bombing event.What I am writing to you about is the government sponsored gun confiscation that is coming to this country. There are people in our government who are determined to take your guns.

We have trained in mock cities on how we will accomplish this feat. We use a traditional checkerboard pattern similar to what the citizens of Boston experienced after the Boston Marathon bombing.

We have routinely practiced the same scenario, repeatedly. To cover a suburban block, our forces approach with two armored personnel carriers on opposite ends of the street, two per side of the street. One vehicle remains on each side of the street as the accompanying vehicle moves down the block. Our teams approach a house from the front but we also flank the house and enter the backyard. Our support vehicle trains its guns on the house. the assault teams consist of a dozen men each. The armored support vehicle has orders to immediately fire upon anyone appearing in a window with anything that could be construed as a gun. Our personnel, will knock one time on the front door. When the door is answered, we secure the individual or individuals and ask them how many people are in the house and where they are. We also ask how many guns are in the house, what type of guns they own and where they are stored and would anyone have guns on their person. Most often we have trained to assault a house between the hours of 3 and 4 in the morning. Then we clear the house with an emphasis on first entering the bedrooms. We accomplish this task in two man teams. We order any occupants to get on the floor and we secure them and then begin the search for guns. We employ a portable metal detector and gun sniffing dogs if available.

Alex Jones was one of the first to cover the mock up of a fake town in Virginia where they practiced martial law style gun confiscation.  By visiting the link, one can see that the accompanying video has been taken down. However, this is was widely covered and speaks to the intent to seize private guns.

In 2014, I reported the fact that, as the source indicated, under FM 39.4, the use of foreign troops to man the FEMA camps and gun confiscation activities would be employed.


And this is why gun registration.....

Is a Bad Thing.

They know that some folks have guns, they have a list.  In fact they have that list because folks took their time to register. Because "Safety".

So now those folks get a letter that says "If you have this device on the gun you registered, you had better turn it in (for no compensation) or face fines or prison or both".

Expect next that there will be mandatory inspections. Why not? They banned an item that was once legal,,,,

Then, soon, because they have that list, the next letter: You firearms is now banned and therefore you must turn it in as well. Because "Assault Rifle" Again: for "safety".

And what are you gonna do about it? You gonna die for an AR? How about a Bump Stock? How about when they say anything with a magazine that holds more than 5 rounds? 2 rounds? Only single shot? Only shotguns? Where is the line?  And remember, they have a list, so they know....and with "universal background checks" they know if you sold it to someone else....or bought one from someone else.....And they know where to come to take it.

They won't come for you all at once, but they will nibble about the edges, first.

All because they "registered" that gun for "safety".

Think about it.

A final thought: If you think it's time to bury 'em, it is really time to dig 'em up and USE THEM. 


Pakistani court has sentenced two Christians in Punjab to death for the crime of blasphemy

Two brothers, Qaisar and Amoon Ayub, were accused in 2011 of posting material offensive to Islam on their website, and subsequently sent to the Jhelum prison in Lahore in 2015. Qaisar testified that he had shut down the offending website in 2009 but that a Muslim acquaintance of his, Shahryar Gill, had resurrected the site keeping the copyright in Qaisar’s name.

On December 13, Judge Javed Iqbal Bosal heard the case in the Jhelum prison for security reason, and there declared the brothers guilty and sentenced them to death. The men are both married and Qaisar is the father of three children.

The Center for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement (CLAAS), an interfaith organization that offers free legal support to victims of religious intolerance, is representing the brothers and announced that it will appeal the sentence to the Lahore High Court as soon as possible.

According to Nasir Saeed, the UK director of CLAAS, the accusation of blasphemy often triggers a violent reaction from Islamic radicals, which often involves threats to judges, upsetting the judicial process.

“Because of the threats of the fundamentalists, lower courts pass the responsibility to the High Courts and these take years to prove the innocence of the accused. This is what we saw with the recent case of Asia Bibi,” Saeed said.

“I am afraid now Qaisir and Amoon will have to wait years to get justice,” Saeed added.


2018 brought one of China’s worst crackdowns on religion, from the astonishing persecution of the Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang province to a series of raids against “underground” Christian churches.

Some Chinese cities banned Christmas decorations and celebrations in an effort to establish the primacy of the communist government and stoke the fires of nationalism at the height of a trade war with the United States.

The South China Morning Post found this Christmas less “cheerful and bustling than other years” in China:

Christmas decorations reportedly have been banned in at least four cities this year, including Langfang, about 55km (34 miles) south of Beijing, where shop windows were stripped of Christmas stickers and streets were kept free of Christmas banners and lights.
The seasonal humbug follows similar outbreaks of anti-Christmas rhetoric in 2014 and 2017. It appears not to be centrally organized, but rather a spreading resistance to foreign festivals by local authorities seeking to align themselves with a changing outlook in the Chinese government.
The capital itself seems free from such bans, though. As a South China Morning Postreporter found, people were continuing to mark Christmas across the sprawling metropolis in ways both commercial and religious, though for the most part Christmas has largely continued to be a shopping festival in Beijing and other cities.

It is not surprising that Beijing would try to appear more relaxed and inclusive to foreign visitors, or that the central government would feel less insecure about the appeal of religion in the seat of its power. Elsewhere in China, regulators were emboldened to go after “unauthorized religious gatherings” by recent amendments to the law.

“It is impossible to have large gatherings. All we can do is get together and celebrate Christmas in small groups,” said one member of an underground church whose founder is currently under house arrest.

On Christmas Eve, the SCMP reported all of the Christmas trees, lights, and bells vanished from a 27-story shopping and office building in the city of Nanyang in less than 24 hours, all the way down to the giant teddy bear who once greeted visitors at the entrance to the shopping area.

Students of President Xi Jinping’s doctrine say the government increasingly views Christmas as a “foreign cultural element” that must be purged for the sake of national unity. Television programs emphasize the importance of Chinese culture over “ostentatious Christmas celebrations.” Extra police have been deployed to prevent overly enthusiastic festivities.

Pressed about these measures, Chinese officials and state-run media insisted they are merely trying to prevent road blockages, illegal street vendors, and excessive clutter from Christmas decorations. Religious freedom activists countered by leaking memos that placed onerous restrictions upon Christmas celebrations and urged the insertion of Communist Party “values” into holiday sermons at government-approved churches.

Despite these efforts, activists said young people in China are increasingly enthusiastic about the Christmas holiday, and some analysts believe Christianity is the fastest-growing religion — which could pose a serious challenge to Xi’s agenda, especially his plan to redefine “human rights” in collectivist terms.


It is hard to believe that this was written in  1965...and not THIS WEEK.

Christian States of America dot net

We accept no money, ads, or donations-only prayers


 Our goal  is to spread God's message and the good news about His Son,  Jesus of Nazareth.-

Please pray for us to have wisdom from Almighty God, and please pray for President Trump and his team, and his entire family. May God HELP him.

Jesus of Nazareth  movie- (1977)


Many videos by:

D.James Kennedy  https://www.djameskennedy.org

Rev.Billy Graham  https://billygraham.org

J.Vernon McGee  https://ttb.org

and many others c an be seen on the internet, 

My faith


 How to get to Heaven ? Simply admit to Jesus that you are a sinner, and accept His forgiveness. Jesus has completed the bridge and paid the toll with His BLOOD. Doesn't matter WHO you are. 

Doesn't matter WHAT you have done. Now you are saved, so START OVER ANEW. God now sees you as WHITE AS SNOW. Congratulations ! I will see you in Heaven !

This website is not sponsored by or affiliated with the United States government or any church or denomination. I am a Bible-believing Christian however.

Bible study


THROUGH THE BIBLE       ttb.org

A 5 year trip through the

Holy Bible with the late

Dr. J.Vernon McGee,

The whole course is free and can be downloaded to a phone or tablet. 


[I have the 5-year Bible study course, plus a selection of Dr.McGee's, Dr. D.James Kennedy's, and Rev.Billy Graham's sermons (audio only) on my tablet  They fit easily on a 16 GB SD memory card with room left over for some of my favorite music.]


The Jews must also accept that jesus is lord !


Trump Cancels  Nasty Pelosi's public relations trip...

Trump has been planning to lead for 35 years.



Are you ready for some SCARY real NEWS ?

Find out more

D.James Kennedy -The NEW 'TOLERANCE'

(I do not own this video). I do not receive any money from videos posted on this site. I DO NOT RECEIVE ANY MONEY FROM ANY SOURCE ANYWHERE FOR ANYTHING ON THIS SITE.